Solution : https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414563 (SAP Service marketplace login required)
Summary :
Users of SAP transactions KO22/KO23 and CJ30-CJ33 may notice discrepancies between the 'Assigned' values shown within these transactional screens and those displayed in various reports. These discrepancies can be traced back to erroneous value updates in the availability control (Case A) or differences in the calculation methodology between the availability control and reporting systems (Case B). To diagnose and resolve discrepancies originating from Case A, users should run analysis reports BPFCTRA1 or BPFCTRA0 and check for inconsistency messages. For discrepancies under Case B, users should be aware of scenarios such as exempt cost elements, suppressed value categories, different report definitions, totaled-up assigned values, effects of user exits, and handling of production orders for valuated project stock, which can lead to different assigned values being displayed. If discrepancies arise that cannot be attributed to incorrect updates (Case A), it is recommended to contact SAP Support with detailed, reproducible examples to facilitate analysis and potential resolution.
Key words :
availability control exempt cost elements, exempt cost elements, cj32/cj33 differ, residual order plan, transactions ko22/ko23, budget-controlled objects, analysis report bpfctra1, analysis report bpfctra0, inform sap support, contact sap support
Related Notes :
1424698 | Budget overrun despite active availability control |
1118333 | Assigned value for goods receipt in valuated project stock |
1103499 | Exempt cost elements in the availability control |
1045796 | When is status ISBD set/reset? |
955107 | Purchs req commitmt not to be taken into accnt in avail.ctrl |
873977 | Controlling elements in availability control |
853530 | Residual order plan not to be taken into account |
777859 | No consideration of outsorted value categories |
676123 | Project Information Database / Value Category Customizing |
178837 | Availability control: Incorrect assigned value? |